Skip to content

Settings and activity

21 results found

  1. 115 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Rosie Perera supported this idea  · 
  2. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 
    Rosie Perera supported this idea  · 
    Rosie Perera shared this idea  · 
  3. 51 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Rosie Perera supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    See also https://community.logos.com/forums/t/102876.aspx for my suggestion of showing library field headers in cover view when grouping by such fields as Type, Subject, My Tags. I also took it further and suggested an expansion of Cover View (as a separate view) called "Catalog View" that would include cover images and book descriptions, though that might need to be a separate suggestion; however if work is being done on Cover View it might make sense to fold this into it. See also https://community.logos.com/forums/t/18752.aspx for someone's PDF version of what a Logos Catalog View might look like.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    Also, allow sorting by primary and secondary (and so on) fields, like you can in Detail view. Would love to see my Cover View sorted by subject or tag and then alphabetically by author within those groupings.

  4. 58 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    This would be a great idea!

  5. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    Please move your votes from this one to the other one so we get more clout. Sorry for creating a redundant suggestion in advance. If only I could have been a prophet and known that a more popular choice would be posted nearly three years later. Mine was purer, but whatever; I concede.

  6. 848 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    More ammunition for this feature request: copy from guides needs to be refined more. You can copy the entire Word by Word section of an Exegetical Guide, but that is probably overkill. What if I only want to copy a definition. We should be able to select any text in a Guide and right click on it and copy it. See https://community.logos.com/forums/t/100070.aspx

  7. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Rosie Perera supported this idea  · 
  8. 0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    This is a duplicate of another suggestion which has more votes; I suggest you move your vote from here to that one:
    http://logos.uservoice.com/forums/42823-logos-bible-software-5/suggestions/3394880-right-cick-history-go-back-forward

  9. 258 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    I'd also like the ability to see these sub-resources listed as (for want of a better term) "virtual" books in my Library, so that when I sort/group by author's name I can see right away that I have them. Also I'd want to be able to click on one to open its parent volume and jump directly to the book in question, etc.

  10. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Rosie Perera shared this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  12. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Rosie Perera shared this idea  · 
  13. 54 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  14. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    Yes, that makes good sense!

  15. 469 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    For those asking why, this is Logos's justification for why: http://blog.logos.com/2008/07/why_a_print_magazine/
    But to me that seems like a lame excuse. You can still keep a print edition and reach all those dinosaurs out there who aren't using computers to do their Bible study even if you have a digital edition. Nothing forces it to be either/or.

  16. 388 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  17. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    I'm not sure a more vivid color is necessary, but I think one thing that would help would be to make the topmost tab of any inactive panels a darker grey like all the tabs that are in the background, so that it's less easily confused for the active tab. The light grey (with the darker bar across the top) should be reserved only for the active tab.

  18. 42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Rosie Perera supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    This feature was marked as "Planned" over two years ago and there has been no forward motion on it. Can it be put into the next release please?

  19. 201 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 

    Yes, the Prioritization panel needs a lot of work as our libraries are growing and those lists are unweildy.

    Categories are a must. Tabs for each category (probably vertical for space usage), or else the ability to expand/collapse categories.

    Also the ability to Search the prioritization list to see whether you've already prioritized a particular book or find where in the list you've put it.

  20. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rosie Perera commented  · 
← Previous 1