Skip to content

Settings and activity

8 results found

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johan le commented  · 

    Added description and some pictures to a forum thread. https://community.logos.com/forums/p/129878/844440.aspx#844440

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johan le commented  · 

    Please ask me to clearify if there is anything that should be clearer. (Probably is a lot...)

    johan le shared this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    johan le supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johan le commented  · 
    johan le shared this idea  · 
  3. 234 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johan le commented  · 

    This has become a lot better with the "multiple resources" function in L7. I would still like to see something closer to what is described above, or by me below.

    johan le supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johan le commented  · 

    This still need to be addressed! It has been an annoying issue since I started using Libronix.
    The best option may be to not resend links which are already active in a resource. Meaning that if Commentary X is active to Romans 3:21-24 and a link to any of those worses are sent from lniked Bible Y the request new link will simply not be listened to by Commentary X.

    A possibility, similar to options discussed below, may be to make it possible for resources to be part of a linkset, but passive/quiet/listening etc. Activating this feature could work like the current "Send Hyperlinks Here" feature. What I mean with this is that changes in passive recourse X will not be reflected in linked resource Y, while changes in resource Y (which is not passive) will be reflected in resource X. Here X could be commentary, Y could be Bible, or Y could be BAGD, X could be A Concise Greek-English Dict..."

    Unlinking commentaries as a workaround should not be something we are forced to do!

  4. 1,091 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johan le commented  · 

    Highlighting doesn't work with Stylus. There are also som difficulties with changing window layout's in tablet mode.

    johan le supported this idea  · 
  5. 40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johan le commented  · 

    There is already one in Pre-pub.

  6. 93 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    johan le supported this idea  · 
  7. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    johan le supported this idea  · 
  8. 52 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)